(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant[ ] Check the appropriate box: [ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) [X] Definitive Proxy Statement [ ] Definitive Additional Materials [ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12 _______________________________________________________ ALPHA SOLARCO INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _______________________________________________________ Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ~~[ ] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii)~~

INNOVATIVE FOOD HOLDINGS, 14a-6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A. [ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3). [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: ________________________________________________________ 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ________________________________________________________ 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): _______________________________________________________ 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: _______________________________________________________ 5) Total fee paid: _______________________________________________________ [X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) Amount Previously Paid: _______________________________________________________ 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: _______________________________________________________ 3) Filing Party: ______________________________________________________ 4) Date Filed: ALPHA SOLARCO INC. ~~510 East University Drive Phoenix, Arizona 85004~~

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF ~~SHAREHOLDERS - November 15, 1995 - To the Shareholders of Alpha Solarco: You are cordially invited to attend the~~STOCKHOLDERS

The Annual Meeting of ~~Shareholders~~Stockholders of ~~Alpha Solarco~~Innovative Food Holdings, Inc. (the ~~"Company" or "Alpha Solarco"~~“Company”) towill be held at _________________________________________, on ~~November 15, 1995~~October 31, 2018 at ~~9:00 A.M. at Grace Inn, I-10 Elliott Avenue (Exit 57)~~, ~~Phoenix, Arizona 85044 for the purposes of considering~~to consider and ~~acting~~act upon the following: 1. Election of five directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 2. Approval of a proposal to amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to effect a one-for-100 reverse stock split. 3. Transactionfollowing matters:

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 13, 2018 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof. ~~Shareholders~~The stock transfer books of ~~record at~~ the ~~close~~Company will remain open.

October 13, 1995 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. All persons who find it convenient to do so are invited to attend the meeting in person. In any event, please sign and return the Proxy enclosed with this Notice at your earliest convenience. Edward C. Schmidt, President IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF1, 2018

WHETHER OR NOT YOU ~~WOULD PROMPTLY EXECUTE~~EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND ~~RETURN~~

SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ~~ENVELOPE. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING,~~ENVELOPE

IN ORDER TO ENSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES. YOU MAY ~~NEVERTHELESS VOTE IN PERSON SHOULD YOU DESIRE. IT~~REVOKE THE

PROXY AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE AUTHORITY GRANTED THEREIN IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED. October 17, 1995 IMPORTANT A proxy statement and proxy are submitted herewith. As a shareholder, you are urged to complete and mail the proxy promptly whether or not you plan to attend this Annual Meeting in person. Shareholders attending the meeting may personally vote on all matters which are considered in which event their signed proxies are revoked. It is important that your shares be voted. In order to avoid the additional expense to the Company of further solicitation, we ask your cooperation in mailing your proxy promptly. ALPHA SOLARCOEXERCISED.

INNOVATIVE FOOD HOLDINGS, INC. ~~510 East University Drive Phoenix, Arizona 85004~~

PROXY STATEMENT ~~October 17, 1995 INTRODUCTION The~~FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of ~~Alpha Solarco~~Innovative Food Holdings, Inc. ~~is soliciting proxies,~~(the “Company”) for use at the ~~form of which is enclosed, for the~~2018 Annual Meeting of ~~the Shareholders~~Stockholders to be held on ~~November 15, 1995. Each~~October 31, 2018, and at any adjournment of that meeting (the “Annual Meeting”). Throughout this Proxy Statement, “we,” “us” and “our” are used to refer to the ~~109,146,060~~Company.

The shares of Common Stock without par value outstanding on October 13, 1995 is entitled to one vote on all matters acted upon at the meeting, and only shareholders of record on the books of the Company at the close of business on October 13, 1995 will be entitled to vote at the meeting, either in person or by proxy. The sharesour common stock represented by ~~all properly executed proxies which are sent to the Company~~each proxy will be voted in accordance with the stockholder’s instructions as ~~designated. However, if a~~to each matter specified thereon, unless no instruction is given, in which case, the proxy ~~is properly executed and returned to the Company, but without designating how the shares are to be voted, they~~ will be voted ~~affirmatively. Each person giving a~~in favor of such matter. A proxy may ~~revoke it~~be revoked by ~~giving notice to~~ the ~~Company in writing or in open meeting~~stockholder at any time before it is ~~voted.~~ exercised by delivery of written revocation or a subsequently dated proxy to our corporate Secretary or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

We are mailing this Proxy Statement to our stockholders on or about October 1, 2018, accompanied by our Annual Report to Stockholders for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

At the close of business on September 13, 2018, the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, there were outstanding and entitled to vote an aggregate of 33,775,306 shares of our common stock, par value $.0001 per share. All holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share.

The ~~expense~~affirmative vote of ~~soliciting proxies~~the holders of a plurality of the shares of our common stock present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for election of directors. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for each of the agenda items. The voting on all items except for the election of directors, ratification of the auditors and authorization of the reverse split are only advisory, as hereinafter described.

With respect to approval of Proposals Nos. 4-10, while our Board will carefully consider the outcome of the vote expressed by our stockholders, the vote will not be binding upon them.

A majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum at the meeting. All shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy (including shares which abstain or do not vote for any reason with respect to one or more of the matters presented for stockholder approval) will be ~~borne by~~counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the ~~Company. Proxies~~Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be ~~solicited principally by mail,~~treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote with respect to any particular matter, but ~~may also~~will not be ~~solicited by~~counted as a vote in favor of such matter. Accordingly, an abstention from voting on a matter has the ~~directors, officers, and other regular employees of~~same legal effect as a vote against the ~~Company, who will receive no compensation therefor in addition to their regular salaries. Brokers and others who hold~~matter. If a broker or nominee holding stock in ~~trust~~“street name” indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote as to a particular matter (“broker non-votes”), those shares will not be ~~asked~~considered as present and entitled to ~~send proxy material~~vote with respect to such matter. Accordingly, a broker non-vote on a matter has no effect on the voting on such matter.

The following table sets forth certain information as of September 7, 2018 with respect to the beneficial ~~owners~~ownership of our common stock by (1) each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (2) each of our directors, (3) each of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation”, below, and (4) all our directors and executive officers as a group.

The persons named in the ~~Company~~enclosed proxy will ~~reimburse them for their expenses. The Company's Annual Report~~vote to ~~Shareholders~~elect as directors the four nominees named below, unless authority to vote for the ~~fiscal year ended May 31, 1995, including financial statements,~~election of any or all of the nominees is ~~enclosed separately. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS At~~withheld by marking the ~~meeting, five directors are~~proxy to that effect. All of the nominees have indicated their willingness to serve, if elected, but if any nominee should be unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by management. Each director will be elected to hold office until the next ~~Annual Meeting~~annual meeting of ~~Shareholders. It~~stockholders or until his successor is ~~the intention~~elected and qualified. There are no family relationships between or among any of our executive officers or directors. Management recommends a vote “FOR” each of the ~~individuals named in~~director nominees.

Set forth below for each nominee as a director is his name, age, and position with us, the proxy to vote all proxies received for the election of only the five nominees named below. The Company is not presently aware of any potential candidates who may be nominated at or prior to the meeting, and in no event will the proxies solicited hereby be voted for more than five nominees designated. All of the nominees listed below, except for Dr. Shell, are presently serving as membersCommittee of the Board ~~of Directors. While management has no reason to believe that any of~~upon which he currently sits, his principal occupation and business experience during at least the ~~nominees will, prior to~~past five years and the date of the ~~meeting, refuse or become unable~~commencement of his term as a director.

Mr. Klepfish has been a director since December 1, 2005. From November 2007 to ~~accept~~present Mr. Klepfish is the ~~nominations, should any nominee so refuse or become unable~~CEO of Innovative Food Holdings and its subsidiaries. From March 2006 to ~~accept,~~November 2007 Mr. Klepfish was the ~~proxies will be voted for such other person or persons for the office~~interim president of director as management may recommend. Nominees receiving the five highest totals of votes cast in the election will be elected as directors. Proxies in the form solicited hereby which are returned to the Company ~~will be voted~~and its subsidiary. From February 2005 to January 2006 Mr. Klepfish was a Managing Partner at ISG Capital, a merchant bank. From May 2004 through February 2005 Mr. Klepfish served as a Managing Director of Technoprises, Ltd. From January 2001 to May 2004 he was a corporate finance analyst and consultant at Phillips Nizer, a New York law firm. From 1998 to December 2000, Mr. Klepfish was an asset manager for several investors in ~~favor of the five nominees specified below unless otherwise instructed by the shareholders. Abstentions~~small-cap entities.

Mr. Gold has been a director since 2004. Mr. Gold is currently a partner in a merchant banking firm, and ~~shares not voted by brokers and other entities holding shares on behalf of beneficial owners will not be counted and will have no effect~~has served on the ~~outcome~~board and committees of the election. Information with respect to each of the five nominees is as follows (see also "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management"): EDWARD C. SCHMIDT, President of Alpha Solarco Inc. since January, 1988.numerous companies. Prior to that, ~~time, Mr. Schmidt~~he was an investment banker at Buckman, Buckman and Reid located in New Jersey, a position he held since May 2010. Prior thereto, from October 2004, he was head of investment banking of Andrew Garrett, Inc. From January 2000 until September 2004, he served as Executive Vice President of Investment Banking of Berry Shino Securities, Inc., an investment banking firm also located in New York City. From January 1999 until December 1999, he was an Executive Vice President of Solid Capital Markets, an investment-banking firm also located in New York City. From September 1997 to January 1999, he served as a Senior Managing Director of Interbank Capital Group, LLC, an investment banking firm also located in New York City. From April 1996 to September 1997, Mr. Gold was an Executive Vice President of LT Lawrence & Co., and from March 1995 to April 1996, a Managing Director of Fechtor Detwiler & Co., Inc. Mr. Gold was a Managing Director of Furman Selz Incorporated from January 1992 until March 1995. From April 1990 until January 1992, Mr. Gold was a Managing Director of Bear Stearns and Co., Inc. (“Bear Stearns”). For approximately 20 years before he became affiliated with Bear Stearns, he held various positions with Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.

Hank Cohn is currently a managing partner of P1 Billing, LLC, a revenue cycle management services provider to ambulatory medical clinics. P1 Billing is a spinoff of PracticeOne Inc., (formerly PractieXpert, Inc., an OTCQB traded company), an integrated PMS and EMR software and services company for physicians. Mr. Cohn served as President and Chief Executive Officer of PracticeOne from December 2005 until December 2010, at which time he sold the company to a large global technology focused private equity firm. Mr. Cohn is also a principal at WTI Outsourcing LLC., a Business Process Outsourcing Company (BPO) with a focus in healthcare. Prior to PracticeOne, Mr. Cohn worked with a number of investment groups as a restructuring and workout specialist for public companies. Mr. Cohn previously served as vice president of Galaxy Ventures, LLC a closely-held investment fund concentrating in the areas of bond trading and early stage technology investments, where he acted as portfolio manager for investments. Hank holds an MBA in Finance and Investments from Baruch College.

Mr. Wiernasz has been a director since November 1, 2013. Effective May 11, 2018 Mr. Wiernasz resigned his position as President and became the Director of Strategic Acquisitions. From July 31, 2008 through May 2018, Mr. Wiernasz was the President of Innovative Food Holdings, Inc. Prior thereto, since May 2007, he was the Executive Vice President of ~~Alpha Solarco.~~Marketing and Sales and Chief Marketing Officer of our operating subsidiary, Food Innovations, Inc., and the President of Food Innovations and our Chief Marketing Officer since December 2007. Prior thereto, he was at USF, our largest customer, for 13 years. From 2005 to 2007 he was the Vice President of Sales & Marketing, USF, Boston, and prior thereto, from 2003 to 2005 he was a National Sales Trainer at USF, Charleston SC, from 1996 to 2003 he was the District Sales Manager at USF, Western Massachusetts, and from 1993 to 1996 he was Territory Manager, USF, Northampton, Easthampton & Amherst, MA. Prior to that from 1989 to 1993 he was the owner and operator J.J.’s food and spirit, a 110 seat restaurant.

We believe that all of our directors are qualified for their positions and each brings a benefit to the board. Messrs. Klepfish as an officer of the company and Wiernasz, as Director of Strategic Acquisitions for the Company, are uniquely qualified to bring management’s perspective to the board’s deliberations. Mr. ~~Schmidt is 63 years old~~Gold, with his lengthy career working for broker/dealers, brings “Wall Street’s” perspective. Mr. Cohn, with his prior history of being an executive and ~~has been~~his experience as a director of ~~the Company since 1979. BEN D. WOLTMAN, Chairman~~other companies, brings a well-rounded background and wealth of experience to our board.

The Board of ~~Woltman-Margol, Inc., Dallas, Texas, manufacturers~~Directors currently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and ~~distributors~~a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. However, inasmuch as we only have two independent directors, each Committee only has two members. We are currently seeking to add additional qualified independent directors to the Board of ~~custom picture frames, for more than five years. Mr. Woltman is 59 years old and has been director~~Directors.

Audit Committee. The primary functions of the ~~Company since 1979. WILSON DENNEHY, President~~Audit Committee are to select or to recommend to our Board the selection of ~~A.R.C., Inc. (private investments) for more than five years. Mr. Dennehy is 57 years old~~outside auditors; to monitor our relationships with our outside auditors and ~~has been director~~their interaction with our management in order to ensure their independence and objectivity; to review, and to assess the scope and quality of, our outside auditor’s services, including the audit of our annual financial statements; to review our financial management and accounting procedures; to review our financial statements with our management and outside auditors; and to review the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls. Messrs. Gold and Cohn are the current members of the ~~Company since 1992. CHARLES DENNEHY, independent equine appraiser~~Audit Committee and ~~advisor for more than five years.~~are each “independent” (as that term is defined in NASD Rule 4200(a)(14)), and are each able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. Mr. ~~Dennehy is 63 years old and has been director~~Gold, our audit committee financial expert, possesses the financial expertise required under Rule 401(h) of Regulation S-K of the Act and NASD Rule 4350(d)(2). He is further “independent”, as that term is defined under Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. Our Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of that charter on an annual basis. The full text of the charter is available on our website at www.ivfh.com.

Compensation Committee. The functions of the Compensation Committee are to make recommendations to the Board regarding compensation of management employees and to administer plans and programs relating to employee benefits, incentives, compensation and awards under our 2011 Stock Option Plan. Messrs. Gold and Cohn are the current members of the Compensation Committee. The Board has determined that each of them is “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s Charter is available on our website at www.ivfh.com. Executive officers that are members of our Board make recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of other executive officers who are not on the Board. Except as otherwise prohibited, the Committee may delegate its responsibilities to subcommittees or individuals. The Compensation Committee has the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain or obtain advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of such persons. The Company ~~since 1992. DR. RICHARD L. SHELL, Professor~~will provide the appropriate funding to such persons as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the overall compensation of ~~Industrial Engineering~~our executive officers for the purpose of determining whether discretionary bonuses should be granted.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to develop our corporate governance system and to review proposed new members of our Board of Directors, including those recommended by our stockholders. Messrs. Gold and Cohn are the current members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board. The full text of the charter is available on our website at www.ivfh.com. The Board has determined that each member of this Committee is “independent,” as defined under the ~~University~~applicable rules of ~~Cincinnati~~the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review, on an annual basis, the composition of our Board of Directors and the ability of its current members to continue effectively as directors for ~~more than five years; acknowledged expert~~the upcoming fiscal year. In the ordinary course, absent special circumstances or a change in ~~among other fields, engineering, industrial~~the criteria for Board membership, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will renominate incumbent directors who continue to be qualified for Board service and who are willing to continue as directors. If that Committee decides it is in our best interests to nominate a new individual as a director in connection with an annual meeting of stockholders, or if a vacancy on the Board occurs between annual stockholder meetings or an incumbent director chooses not to run, the nominating committee will seek out potential candidates for Board appointment who meet the criteria for selection as a nominee and have the specific qualities or skills being sought. Director candidates will be selected based on input from members of the Board, our senior management and, ~~productivity; served~~if the Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate each candidate’s qualifications and check relevant references and each candidate will be interviewed by at least one member of that Committee. Candidates meriting serious consideration will meet with all members of the Board. Based on this input, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate whether a prospective candidate is qualified to serve as ~~consultant~~a director and ~~investigator~~whether the Committee should recommend to the Board that this candidate be appointed to fill a current vacancy on the Board, or presented for ~~numerous national~~the approval of the stockholders, as appropriate.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and ~~local corporations. Dr. Shell is 56 years old. None~~Board Member Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meeting

During 2017, the Board of Directors met or acted without a meeting pursuant to written consent 7 times. All directors attended at least 75% of all board meetings and committee meetings of which they are members.

We do not have a formal written policy with respect to board members’ attendance at annual stockholder meetings, although we do encourage each of them to attend. We expect at least a majority of the directors ~~presently serve as~~currently serving and nominated for re-election to attend our 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting.

Stockholders interested in communicating with our Board may do so by writing to any or all directors, care of ~~other corporations~~our Chief Executive Officer, at our principal executive offices. Our Chief Executive Officer will log in all stockholder correspondence and forward to the director addressee(s) all communications that, ~~either have a class~~in his judgment, are appropriate for consideration by the directors. Any director may review the correspondence log and request copies of ~~securities registered~~any correspondence. Examples of communications that would be considered inappropriate for consideration by the directors include, but are not limited to, commercial solicitations, trivial, obscene, or profane items, administrative matters, ordinary business matters, or personal grievances. Correspondence that is not appropriate for Board review will be handled by our Chief Executive Officer. All appropriate matters pertaining to accounting or internal controls will be brought promptly to the attention of our Audit Committee

Stockholder recommendations for director nominees are welcome and should be sent to our Chief Executive Officer, who will forward such recommendations to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and should include the following information: (a) all information relating to each nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number of shares of our common stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders; and (c) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualification of each nominee, and must be submitted in the time frame described under the caption, “Stockholder Proposals for 2019 Annual Meeting,” below. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by other sources, using additional criteria, if any, approved by the Board from time to time. Our stockholder communication policy may be amended at any time with the consent of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

We have a Code of Ethics that applies to all our employees, officers and directors. This code was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. This code is posted on our website, www.ivfh.com.

Our executive officers are elected by our Board of Directors and serve pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. One of our executive officers, Sam Klepfish, is also a director of the Company. See the section above entitled “Nominees” for biographical information about this officer.

Mr. McDonald, age 55, has been our principal accounting officer since November 2007; from November 2007 through October 2017, he was also our Chief Information Officer. From 2004 through 2007, Mr. McDonald worked as a consultant with Softrim Corporation of Estero, Florida where he created custom applications for a variety of different industries and assisted in building interfaces to accounting applications. Since 1999 he has also been President of McDonald Consulting Group, Inc. which provides consulting on accounts receivable, systems and accounting services.

During 2017, Messrs. Gold, Cohn, and Klepfish did not file four Forms 4, Mr. Wiernasz did not file five Forms 4, and Mr. McDonald did not file one Form 4. None of the unfiled Forms 4 related to the public sale of securities.

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for services rendered to us for the year ended December 31, 2017, of our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, if any. We refer to the Chief Executive Officer and these other officers as the named executive officers.

(b) Consists of the portion of RSUs which were recognized as a period cost during the year.

(d) Consists of a cash bonus paid during the year for services performed in 2016.

(e) Consists of the portion of restricted stock awards which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as an executive officer. Does not include $7,826 of restricted stock awards which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as a board member.

(f) Consists of a cash bonus paid during the year for services performed in 2015. Does not include $65,000 in cash bonuses for services performed in 2016 but not paid during the year.

(g) Consists of the portion of RSUs which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as an executive officer. Does not include $55,304 of RSUs which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as a board member.

(h) Consists of a cash bonus paid during the year for services performed in 2015. Does not include $50,000 in cash bonuses and 116,279 of RSUs with a fair value of $75,000 for services performed in 2015 but not paid during the year.

(i) Consists of the portion of RSUs which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as an executive officer. Does not include $163,826 of RSUs which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as a board member.

(j) Consists of the portion of restricted stock awards which were recognized as a period cost during the year for services as an executive officer.

(j1) Consists of a cash bonus paid during the year for services performed in 2016.

(l) Consists of options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $992.

(m) Consists of a cash bonus paid during the year for services performed in 2014. Does not include $30,000 in cash bonuses and 46,512 RSUs with a fair value of $30,000 for services performed in 2015 but not paid during the year.

(a) Restricted stock awards vest according to the following schedule: An additional 125,000 restricted stock awards will vest contingent upon the attainment of a stock price of $2.00 per share for 20 consecutive trading days, and an additional 175,000 restricted stock awards will vest contingent upon the attainment of a stock price of $3.00 per share for 20 consecutive trading days.

(b) Amounts are calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $1.19 per share, which is the closing price of common stock on December 31, 2017 (the last trading day of the 2016 fiscal year).

The following table sets forth the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:

(a) Does not include 270,000 RSUs at $1.00 per share granted to each director and included in 2014 for service in years 2015, 2016, and 2017. These RSUs are contingent upon being a member of the board in those years. The amount of $163,826 was included as a period cost for these RSUs in 2015. Mr. Klepfish has declined this grant of RSUs which the Company offered to all Directors in 2014.

Our subsidiary, Food Innovations, has employment agreements with certain officers and certain employees. The employment agreements provide for salaries and benefits, including stock grants and extend up to five years. In addition to salary and benefit provisions, the agreements include defined commitments should the employer terminate the employee with or without cause.

On November 20, 2012 we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Klepfish, the Corporation’s CEO, having an effective date of January 1, 2013 and terminating on December 31, 2015. The agreement provides a base compensation in the amount of $198,312 in cash plus an additional $27,937 in restricted stock units for year one, $223,987 in cash plus an additional $24,875 in restricted stock units for year two, and $260,075 in cash plus an additional $13,688 in restricted stock units for year three. The agreement also provides for annual bonuses including bonuses based on increases in EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) of our various subsidiaries; additional bonuses upon the occurrence of certain events such as: listing on specific stock exchanges, spin-offs, investments and stock trading and volume levels. The agreement also provides for stock options with exercise prices ranging from $0.40 - $1.60 and an award of restricted stock, which only vests if certain volume and pricing milestones with respect to our common stock are met. Mr. Klepfish also has the option of receiving any portion of his salary or bonus in the form of equity. The agreement also contains non-compete and non-solicitation provisions.

On August 7, 2014, our board of directors approved the amendment of the Employment Agreement with Mr. Klepfish effective as of August 13, 2014. The employment agreement was amended as follows: (i) it has been extended by one year to December 31, 2016; (ii) it provides for 10% annual increases of Base Salary commencing in 2014; (iii) certain performance based bonuses in the employment agreement are eliminated; (iv) stock grants previously issued with vesting based upon performance or stock price are cancelled; (v) a new performance based bonus structure to partially replace the previous structure, based upon meeting certain Cash EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization and non-cash compensation charges) targets, the new bonus will have a cash portion and a stock portion and all Base Salary can be paid in cash or in stock at the option of Mr. Klepfish, and (vi) 125,00 restricted stock units which vest if the 30 day average closing price of our common stock is $2.00 or above and there is a 50,000 average daily volume or there is a 50,000 average daily volume for 14 straight trading days; and 175,000 restricted stock units which vest if the 30 day average closing price of our common stock is $3.00 or above and there is a 50,000 average daily volume for 14 straight trading days. Mr. Klepfish will have the option, on an annual basis, to take all or part of the cash portion of the bonus, or any part of Base Salary in the form of stock at a valuation based upon the closing stock price on the last trading day of the prior year. The decision on how much, if any, of the bonus to take in stock must be made by May 1 of each year, unless earlier required. The Cash EBITDA target levels do not include the effect of any potential future acquisitions and also do not include certain one time or non-recurring expenses in the calculation of the Cash EBITDA. If a Cash EBITDA target is missed by 3% or less, the bonus for the target so missed shall be reduced by 20% and if it is missed by 3.1% -5%, the bonus for such target shall be reduced by 30%, except in both cases, Mr. Klepfish has negative discretion to further reduce the bonuses or even cancel them. In March 2016, Mr. Klepfish’s employment agreement was extended for another year under the same terms.

In November 2014, the employment agreement of Mr. Klepfish was amended (i) in the event of a change of control (as defined below) all equity based compensation (including options and restricted stock units) payable pursuant to such employment agreements, shall immediately vest and/or restrictions thereon shall lapse, and (ii) to provide that in the event of a termination without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) they shall receive a lump sum payment equal to the greater of (x) the salary payable over the last six months of the term of the agreement, or (y) the Base Salary (as defined in the employment agreement) remaining through the end of the then-current term of the agreement. The definition of change of control shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events: (w) the sale or transfer by the Company for at least $25 million (such consideration consisting of cash, cash equivalents, notes or securities) of more than 50% of its Voting Securities (as defined below) or substantially all of its assets; or (x) the acquisition, other than from the Company or employees of it or any of its subsidiaries, by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) (other than an employee benefit plan of the Company) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Voting Securities”); or (y) the approval by the stockholders of the Company of a reorganization, merger, consolidation or recapitalization of the Company (a “Business Combination”), other than a Business Combination in which more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding Voting Securities of the surviving or resulting entity immediately following the Business Combination is held by the persons who, immediately prior to the Business Combination, were the holders of the Voting Securities; or (z) the approval by the stockholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Mr. Klepfish was awarded, as a special bonus, effective November 17, 2014, an aggregate of 1,000,000 restricted stock units (“RSU”) subject to time and performance vesting conditions, with the ~~reporting~~timing conditions as follows: 150,000 RSUs vest on each of July 1 and December 31, 2015; 300,000 RSUs vest on December 31, 2016 and 400,000 RSUs vest on July 1, 2017, and the performance conditions are as follows: for the RSUs vesting in 2015, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, must have four months with sales above $2,500,000 during 2015, for the RSUs vesting in 2016, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, must have four months with sales above $2,500,000 during 2016 and for the RSUs vesting in 2017, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, must have four months with sales above $2,500,000 during 2017, provided however, that if the performance condition is not met in any year, the RSUs scheduled to vest in such year will still vest if the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, has six months with sales of at least $2,500,000 during the following year. The company’s board of directors will modify and increase the performance requirements, with the consent of executive, if warranted and appropriate.

Effective March 29, 2017, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Klepfish. The new agreement, which runs through December 31, 2019 maintains the current base salary, and provides for all bonuses and salary increases to be approved by a compensation committee.

On November 20, 2012 we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Wiernasz, the Company’s President, having an effective date of January 1, 2013 and terminating on December 31, 2015 The agreement is for a term of three years, and provides a base compensation in the amount of $226,250 per annum for year one, $248,875 per annum for year two, and $273,763 per annum for year three. The agreement also provides for annual bonuses including bonuses based on increases in EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) of our various subsidiaries; additional bonuses upon the occurrence of certain events such as: listing on specific stock exchanges, spin-offs, investments and stock trading and volume levels. The agreement also provides for stock options with exercise prices ranging from $0.40 - $1.60 and an award of restricted stock, which only vests if certain volume and pricing milestones with respect to our common stock are met. Mr. Wiernasz also has the option of receiving any portion of his salary or bonus in the form of equity. The agreement also contains non-compete and non-solicitation provisions.

On August 7, 2014, our board of directors approved the amendment of the Employment Agreement with Mr. Wiernasz effective as of August 13, 2014. The employment agreement was amended as follows: (i) it has been extended by one year to December 31, 2016; (ii) it provides for 10% annual increases of Base Salary commencing in 2014; (iii) certain performance based bonuses in the employment agreement are eliminated; (iv) stock grants previously issued with vesting based upon performance or stock price are cancelled; (v) a new performance based bonus structure to partially replace the previous structure, based upon meeting certain Cash EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization and non-cash compensation charges) targets, the new bonus will have a cash portion and a stock portion and all Base Salary can be paid in cash or in stock at the option of Mr. Wiernasz, and (vi) an award of 75,000 restricted stock units which vest on January 1, 2015 and 75,000 restricted stock units which vest on May 1, 2016. Mr. Wiernasz will have the option, on an annual basis, to take all or part of the cash portion of the bonus, or any part of Base Salary in the form of stock at a valuation based upon the closing stock price on the last trading day of the prior year. The decision on how much, if any, of the bonus to take in stock must be made by May 1 of each year, unless earlier required. The Cash EBITDA target levels do not include the effect of any potential future acquisitions and also do not include certain one time or non-recurring expenses in the calculation of the Cash EBITDA. If a Cash EBITDA target is missed by 3% or less, the bonus for the target so missed shall be reduced by 20% and if it is missed by 3.1% -5%, the bonus for such target shall be reduced by 30%. In March 2016, Mr. Wiernasz’s employment agreement was extended for another year under the same terms.

The employment agreement of Mr. Wiernasz was amended (i) in the event of a change of control (as defined below) all equity based compensation (including options and restricted stock units) payable pursuant to such employment agreements, shall immediately vest and/or restrictions thereon shall lapse, and (ii) to provide that ~~Act.~~in the event of a termination without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) they shall receive a lump sum payment equal to the greater of (x) the salary payable over the last six months of the term of the agreement, or (y) the Base Salary (as defined in the employment agreement) remaining through the end of the then-current term of the agreement. The definition of change of control shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events: (w) the sale or transfer by the Company for at least $25 million (such consideration consisting of cash, cash equivalents, notes or securities) of more than 50% of its Voting Securities (as defined below) or substantially all of its assets; or (x) the acquisition, other than from the Company or employees of it or any of its subsidiaries, by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) (other than an employee benefit plan of the Company) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Voting Securities”); or (y) the approval by the stockholders of the Company of a reorganization, merger, consolidation or recapitalization of the Company (a “Business Combination”), other than a Business Combination in which more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding Voting Securities of the surviving or resulting entity immediately following the Business Combination is held by the persons who, immediately prior to the Business Combination, were the holders of the Voting Securities; or (z) the approval by the stockholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Mr. Wiernasz was awarded, as a special bonus, effective November 17, 2014, an aggregate of 1,000,000 restricted stock units (“RSU”) subject to time and performance vesting conditions, with the timing conditions as follows: 150,000 RSUs vest on each of July 1 and December 31, 2015; 300,000 RSUs vest on December 31, 2016 and 400,000 RSUs vest on July 1, 2017, and the performance conditions are as follows: for the RSUs vesting in 2015, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, must have four months with sales above $2,500,000 during 2015, for the RSUs vesting in 2016, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, must have four months with sales above $2,500,000 during 2016 and for the RSUs vesting in 2017, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, must have four months with sales above $2,500,000 during 2017, provided however, that if the performance condition is not met in any year, the RSUs scheduled to vest in such year will still vest if the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, has six months with sales of at least $2,500,000 during the following year. The company’s board of directors will modify and increase the performance requirements, with the consent of executive, if warranted and appropriate.

On March 21, 2017, the board of directors approved a $65,000 cash bonus for Mr. Wiernasz with respect to his performance in 2016.

Effective March 29, 2017, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Wiernasz. The new agreement, which runs through December 31, 2019 maintains the current base salary, and provides for all bonuses and salary increases to be approved by the board of directors’ compensation committee.

On May 11, 2018, as part of a realignment towards focusing on certain specific growth initiatives and growth opportunities, the President of the Company was named as the Director of Strategic Acquisitions, whose responsibilities include: (i) identifying and assisting in the acquisition and integration of strategic assets; (ii) identifying and executing on new growth opportunities; and (iii) identifying and executing growth initiatives for the Company. In order to allow for the Executive to devote his full time to his new responsibilities, the President of the Company resigned from his role as President of the Company and its subsidiaries.

None of our executive officers has served as a director or member of a compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director or a member of our Compensation Committee.

Upon the recommendation of our Audit Committee, our Board of Directors has appointed the firm of Liggett & Webb P.A. as our principal independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, subject to ratification by the stockholders. Liggett & Webb P.A. has been our independent auditors since November 9, 2012. Management recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

If the appointment of Liggett & Webb P.A. is not ratified or if it declines to act or their engagement is otherwise discontinued, the Board of Directors will appoint other independent auditors. Representatives of Liggett & Webb P.A. are not expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, but via telephonic hookup will have the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting, if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

During the year, ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, Liggett & Webb P.A. billed us audit fees of approximately $85,200 and $104,200, respectively.

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by Liggett & Webb P.A. that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements including our quarterly interim reviews on Form 10-Q and are reported under Audit Fees above.

Liggett & Webb P.A. tax fees were $10,000 and $10,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Liggett & Webb P.A. has not billed any other fees since their engagement on November 9, 2012.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 the board of directors considered the audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees paid to our accountants, as disclosed above, and determined that the payment of such fees was compatible with maintaining the independence of the accountants. Our board of directors pre-approves all auditing services and all permitted non-auditing services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, except for de minimis non-audit services that are approved by the board of directors prior to the completion of the audit.

IN A RATIO RANGING FROM 2:1 TO 10:1 AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD ~~OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS, COMMITTEES AND COMPENSATION~~

The proposed Reverse Stock Split is intended to raise the market price of our common stock to qualify to have our common stock listed on NASDAQ or on another stock exchange. The Company is currently considering listing its common stock on NASDAQ or on another stock exchange and the Reverse Split is intended to provide the Company the flexibility it may need as it relates to its stock price to qualify for such a listing.

Under economic theory, and as experience shows, the market price of our common stock should rise in an inverse amount to the ratio of the reverse split. However, the market price of our common stock is also based on factors that may be unrelated to the number of shares outstanding. These factors include our performance, general economic and market conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, following the initial expected rise following the implementation of the reverse split, the market price of our stock may fall resulting in a loss of net value to your portfolio.

The Reverse Stock Split will affect all of our shareholders uniformly. We will not issue fractional shares, but rather will round up any fractional shares to the next highest full share as a consequence of the Reverse Stock Split.

After the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split (as will be determined in the discretion of our Board of Directors, but no later than the record date of our next annual meeting of stockholders), each stockholder will own a reduced number of shares of our common stock, but will hold the same percentage of the outstanding shares as such stockholder held prior to the effective date. The number of shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of outstanding rights to receive shares of our common stock or conversion of an outstanding convertible note and the per share conversion prices thereof, will be adjusted appropriately to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split as of the effective date.

The liquidity of our common stock may be adversely affected by the reduced number of freely trading shares outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the split will increase the number of shareholders who own odd-lots. An odd-lot is fewer than 100 shares. Such shareholders may experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and may have greater difficulty in making sales.

The Reverse Stock Split will not affect the par value of our common stock. As a result, on the effective date of any such implementation, the stated capital on our balance sheet attributable to our common stock will be reduced in proportion with the exchange ratio for the Reverse Stock Split (as will be determined in the discretion of our Board of Directors, but no later than the record date of our next annual meeting of shareholders) and our additional paid-in capital account will be credited with the amount by which the stated capital is reduced. These accounting entries will have no impact on total shareholders' equity. All share and per share information will be retroactively adjusted following the effective date to reflect the Reverse Stock Split for all periods presented in future filings.

It is not possible for the Board to predict at this time the appropriate size of any reverse split that might be necessary to consummate a potential future listing on NASDAQ or another other stock exchange should the Company decide to pursue a listing. Accordingly, we are asking for approval to give our Board discretion to implement a reverse split within the range of 2:1 to 10:1 based upon the determination by our Board of Directors of the ~~Company meets~~appropriate ratio based upon the relevant factors at least once each year. In the fiscal year ended May 31, 1995, the Board met on 12 occasions. The Company has no standing audit, nominating, or compensation committees. Each incumbent director during the last fiscal year attended 75% or more of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors (held during the period for which he has beensuch time. Management recommends a director) and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he served (during the periods that he served). Officers of the Company receive no additional compensation for their service on the Board. There are no standard arrangements for compensation of directors and no compensation was paid to any director during the year ended May 31, 1995. PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO EFFECT 1 FOR 100 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT The Company's Common Stock has been listed on the National Association of Securities Dealer's Automated Quotations SmallCap Market (the "Nasdaq System") since 1979. In 1991 the SEC approved a rule change regarding the criteria for initial and continued inclusion on the Nasdaq System. Pursuant to the rule change, to continue listing on the Nasdaq System, a company must have and maintain (i) minimum total assets of $2,000,000, (ii) minimum shareholders' equity of $1,000,000, (iii) a minimum bid price per share of $1.00, (iv) a minimum market value of the public float for the Company's securities of $200,000, and (v) a minimum of two market makers for the company's securities; provided than an issuer is not required to maintain the $1.00 per share minimum bid price if it maintains a market value of the public float of its securities of $1,000,000 and shareholders' equity of at least $2,000,000 (the "Nasdaq Listing Requirements"). The Company was recently informed by Nasdaq that the Company is not in compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Requirements. Nasdaq has informed the Company that if the Company's Common Stock closes at a minimum bid price of $1.00 or greater for ten consecutive trading days between September 19, 1995 and December 18, 1995, then the Company will have complied with the minimum bid price requirement. Alternatively, if the Company's capital and surplus and market value of public float equals or exceeds $2,000,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, for ten consecutive trading days during the same period, then the Company will also be deemed in compliance. If the Company does not comply with the Nasdaq Listing Requirements by the end ofvote “FOR” this period, however, it will become subject to a formal delisting action. The Company's Board of Directors has determined that continued listing of the Company's Common Stock on the Nasdaq System is in the best interests of the holders of the Common Stock. If the Common Stock were to be disqualified for listing on the Nasdaq System, the Common Stock would continue to be traded only in the "pink sheets" maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. or the Nasdaq Bulletin Board, which is generally considered to be a less efficient market than the Nasdaq System. The Company's shareholder's equity $1,068,000 as of August 31, 1995) is substantially less than the required $2,000,000. proposal .

Because there can no assurance that the Company will be able to secure the necessary equity investments which would increase its shareholders' equity to $2,000,000 or more, the Board of Directors has concluded that it will be necessary to attempt to raise the per share trading value of the Company's Common Stock by effecting a 1-for-100 reverse stock split ("Reverse Stock Split"), although there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split will ~~in fact~~ result in the desired per share price increase. In the absence of the Reverse Stock Split, however, the Board believes that it is very unlikely that the Company will be able to maintain its Common Stock on the Nasdaq System. The Board of Directors has identified other reasons for the Reverse Stock Split in addition to compliance with the Nasdaq System requirements. The Board believes that the relatively low per-share market price of the Common Stock may impair the acceptability of the Common Stock to certain institutional investors and other members of the investing public. Theoretically, thean increased number of authorized but unissued shares ~~outstanding should not, by itself, affect the marketability~~ of ~~the~~our common stock, ~~the type of investor who acquires~~ it or the Company's reputation in the financial community. In practice this is not necessarily the case, as certain investors view low-priced stock as unattractive or, as a matter of policy, are precluded from purchasing low-priced shares. In addition, certain brokerage houses as a matter of policy, will not extend margin credit on stock trading at low prices. On the other hand, certain other investors may be attracted to low-price stock because of the greater trading volatility sometimes associated with such securities. In order to effect the Reverse Stock Split it is necessary that the Company's shareholders approve a proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation. Certain Effects of Reverse Stock Split The Board of Directors recognizes that reverse stock splits are commonly believed to result in a decrease in the aggregate market value ofconstrued as having an issuer's common stock. The Board of Directors believes, however, that this possible negative impact is outweighed by what it perceives to be a greater negative impact upon aggregate market valuation of delisting the Common Stock from the Nasdaq System. A vote for the proposal will include authorization of the Company's Board of Directors not to file the amendment to effect the Reverse Stock Split in the event the Board of Directors determines that filing the amendment would not be in the best interests of the Company's shareholders. Factors leading to such a determination could include, without limitation, the Company's failure to meet other applicable requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq System or substantially improved prospects for the Company's future ability to meet alternative Nasdaq Listing Requirements without effecting the Reverse Stock Split. The Company is currently authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, of which 109,146,060 shares were outstanding at the close of business on May 31, 1995. Ifanti-takeover effect. Although the Reverse Stock Split is ~~effected,~~not being proposed by the Board for this purpose, in the future the Board of Directors could, subject to its fiduciary duties and applicable law, use the increased number of authorized but unissued shares to frustrate persons seeking to take over or otherwise gain control of the Company, for example, by privately placing shares with purchasers who might side with the Board in opposing a hostile takeover bid. Shares of common stock could also be issued to a holder who would ~~remain~~thereafter have sufficient voting power to assure that any proposal to amend or repeal our Bylaws or certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation would not receive the ~~same, but~~requisite vote. Such uses of our common stock could render more difficult, or discourage, an attempt to acquire control of our Company if the Board opposed such transactions.

☐ The number of shares ~~outstanding would~~owned by each holder of common stock on the record date of a reverse split will be ~~decreased to approximately 1,091,461 shares. With~~proportionally reduced by a factor between 50% and 90%, but the ~~exception of the number of authorized shares, the rights and preferences of the shares of Common Stock~~shareholder’s percentage ownership of the Company ~~before~~will remain unchanged;

☐ The number of shares of common stock we are authorized to issue will remain at 500,000,000;

☐ Shares of our common stock underlying our outstanding convertible notes, options and warrants will be reduced proportionally and the conversion and exercise prices increased proportionally.

The shares of our common stock to be issued following the Reverse Stock Split will ~~remain~~be fully paid and non-assessable. The Reverse Stock Split will not change any of the ~~same. If~~rights of the shareholders of our common stock. The new shares will have the same voting rights and rights to dividends and distributions and will be identical in all other respects to the shares of our common stock that were issued prior to the Reverse Stock ~~Split is effected, it is not anticipated that the financial condition of the Company, the~~Split. Each shareholder's percentage ownership ~~of management, the number of shareholders of the Company, or any other aspect of the Company's business would materially change~~will not be altered as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, but each shareholder could incur dilution, which could be substantial, as a result of additional corporate issuances of extra available shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

On the record date of September 13, 2018 described above, there were 33,775,306 shares of our common stock issued and validly outstanding and an additional 650,000 shares underlying outstanding options.

The ~~result~~following table sets forth the number of Common Shares issued and outstanding as of the record date of this Proxy Statement and upon implementation of a Reverse ~~Stock~~ Split ~~effected due~~at a ratio of 2:1, 5:1 and 10:1. Inasmuch as we cannot predict at this time the actual ratio that our Board will select, these examples will provide information with respect to the ~~proposed amendment would be that shareholders~~highest, lowest and mid-range of the ~~Company who own 100 or more~~possible ratios. We currently have 500 million authorized shares of ~~Common Stock will receive one share~~common stock.

The Board of ~~new Common Stock~~Directors wants to express its appreciation to shareholders who made suggestions and offered advice to the company in connection with some of the following Proposals submitted for consideration. The company invites both formal and informal proposals and suggestions for future meetings. Ours is an endeavor shared by management, our employees and our shareholders, all of whom have contributed to our achievements and can contribute to our future success.

At the impetus of certain shareholders, the following five proposals were developed following consultations with management, counsel and investment professionals and input from certain shareholders and are being presented to the shareholders, purely on an advisory basis, so that the Board can gauge the interest of the shareholders for each ~~100 shares~~ of ~~Common Stock held~~these items and after seeing the results and after further review and contemplation to determine which, if any, to adopt. As each proposal has both potential advantages and disadvantages, management is not taking a position with respect to any of these proposals as it does not want to unduly influence the voting results.

ACTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHOULD REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A MAJORITY OF DIRECTORS THEN IN OFFICE, REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY DIRECTORS ARE PRESENT AT A MEETING

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHOULD USE REASONABLE EFFORTS SO THAT A MAJORITY OF THE DIRECTORS WILL BE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND IF THERE IS NOT A MAJORITY OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT ANY GIVEN TIME, A SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS SHOULD BE FORMED WITHIN TEN BUSINESS DAYS TO INITIATE A FORMAL SELECTION PROCESS TO LOCATE PERSONS WHO COULD FILL THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR POSITION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHOULD CONSIST OF AT LEAST FIVE DIRECTORS AND IF THERE IS A VACANCY, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHOULD USE REASONABLE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO FORM A SPECIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMITTEE WITHIN TEN BUSINESS DAYS OF SUCH VACANCY TO INITIATE A FORMAL SEARCH PROCESS TO FILL BOARD VACANCIES WITH QUALIFIED DIRECTORS

THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS SHALL REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A DESIGNATED BOARD COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS: (I) AN ACQUISITION IN WHICH 20% OR MORE OF THE COMPANY’S OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK, OR 5% WITH RESPECT TO A RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION, ARE PROPOSED TO BE ISSUED, (II) ISSUANCES OF COMPANY COMMON STOCK WHICH WILL RESULT IN A CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE COMPANY, AND (III) A PRIVATE PLACEMENT INVOLVING COMMON STOCK EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 20% OF THE PRE-ISSUANCE OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK AT A PRICE LESS THAN THE GREATER OF BOOK VALUE OR MARKET VALUE.

Our stockholders are being provided the opportunity to cast a non-binding, advisory vote (commonly known as "say on pay") on the compensation of the executive officers named in the "Summary Compensation Table" above (collectively, the "named executive officers"). This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the executive compensation policies and practices described in this proxy statement, through consideration of the following non-binding advisory resolution:

“Resolved, that the stockholders advise that they approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.”

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, reward and retain talented executives to lead our company in a highly competitive market, while maximizing shareholder returns. We believe that our compensation program, which ties a significant portion of pay to performance, provides competitive compensation to our executives and utilizes components that align the interests of our executives with shareholders. We believe this approach helps make our management team a key driver in the company’s success. Please see the compensation tables and related narrative discussion relating to compensation paid to our named executive officers.

Management recommends a vote “FOR” this resolution as it believes that our executive compensation is fair and reasonable and allows us to attract and retain qualified executives.

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF
FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our stockholders are being provided the opportunity to cast a non-binding, advisory vote on how often we should include an advisory vote on our executive compensation (or "say on pay") in our proxy materials for future annual meetings of our stockholders or any other meetings of our stockholders at which directors are elected. You may vote to hold such an advisory vote every year, every two years or every three years, or may abstain from voting. After careful consideration, our Board has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company and, therefore, recommends that you vote for the choice of "every year" for future advisory votes on our executive compensation.

We believe that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our practice of seeking input and engaging in dialogue with our shareholders on corporate governance matters (including the Company's practice of having all directors elected annually) and our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. However, shareholders should note that, because the advisory vote on executive compensation occurs well after the beginning of the compensation year and because we have a multi-year employment agreement with our chief executive officer which specifies many of the elements of his compensation, in many cases it may not be appropriate or feasible to change our executive compensation programs in consideration of any one year's advisory vote on executive compensation by the time of the ~~Reverse Stock Split,~~following year's annual meeting of shareholders.

We must receive a stockholder proposal (and any supporting statement) to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and ~~one additional share~~proxy for our annual meeting in ~~lieu~~2019 at our principal executive offices on or before June 3, 2019. Any other proposal that a stockholder intends to present at that meeting may be deemed untimely unless we have received written notice of such proposal on or before August 17, 2019. Stockholders should send proposals and notices addressed to Innovative Food Holdings, Inc., 28411 Race Track Road, Bonita Springs, FL 34135, Attention: Secretary.

We have not received any other proposal or notice of any stockholder’s intention to present any proposal at our annual meeting, and we are not aware of any matter, other than those discussed above in this Proxy Statement, to be presented at the ~~issuance of factional shares of new Common Stock. Shareholders of~~meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the ~~Company who own fewer than 100 shares of Common Stock on~~annual meeting, the date the Reverse Stock Split is effected will be entitled to receive one share of new Common Stock in lieu of receiving fractional shares resulting from the Reverse Stock Split. There can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split will not adversely impact the market price of the Common Stock, that the marketability of the Common Stock will improve as a result of approval of the Reverse Stock Split or that the approval of the Reverse Stock Split will otherwise have any of the effects described herein. Federal Income Tax Consequences The following discussion summarizing certain federal income tax and Colorado state tax consequences is based on current law and is included for general information only. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors as to the federal, state, local and foreign tax effects of the Reverse Stock Split in light of their individual circumstances. The receipt of new Common Stock solely in exchange for Common Stock will not result in recognition of gain or loss to the shareholder. The adjusted tax basis of the shareholder's new Common Stock will be the same as the shareholder's adjusted tax basis in exchanged Common Stock. The holding period of new Common Stock received solely in exchange for Common Stock will include the shareholder's holding periodpersons named in the ~~exchanged Common Stock. No gain or loss~~attached proxy intend to vote on such matter as directed by our Board of Directors.

We will ~~be recognized~~bear all costs of solicitation of proxies. In addition to solicitations by mail, our directors, officers and regular employees, without additional remuneration, may solicit proxies by telephone, telegraph, facsimile, mail and personal interviews, and we reserve the ~~Company upon the Reverse Stock Split. Exchange of Certificates in the Event of a Reverse Stock Split If the proposal is approved by the shareholders, the Company will file an amendment~~right to its Articles of Incorporation with the Colorado Secretary of State. The Reverse Stock Split would become effective on the date of that filing (the "Effective Date"). As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, shareholders will be notified and requested to surrender the certificates representing their shares of Common Stock of the Company to the Company's transfer agent, American Securities Transfer, Inc., in exchange for certificates representing their shares of new Common Stock. Commencing with the Effective Date, each certificate representing shares of Common Stock will be deemed, for all corporate purposes, to evidence ownership of shares of new Common Stock. If a shareholder owns fewer than 100 shares of Common Stock or holds a number of shares not evenly divisible by 100, that shareholder will receive an additional share of new Common Stock in lieu of receiving fractional shares of new Common Stock. For the purpose of determining ownership of Common Stock at the Effective Date, shares will be considered to be held by the person in whose name those shares are registered on the stock records of the Company, regardless of the beneficial ownership of those shares. For example, if certain shares are registered in the name of a husband, and certain other shares are registered in the name of the husband and his wife, those two amounts of shares will be treated separately and as held by two different share holderscompensate outside agencies for the purpose of ~~determining ownership of Common Stock at the Effective Date. No service charge~~soliciting proxies. We will be payable by shareholders in connection with the exchange of certificates, all expenses of which will be borne by the Company. Required Shareholder Approval The proposal of a Reverse Stock Split by amending the Articles of Incorporation is contained in the following resolution which will be submittedrequest brokers, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting material to the shareholders for adoption at the Annual Meeting: RESOLVED, that the Article Fourth of the Articles of Incorporation of Alpha Solarco Inc. shall be amended to read in its entirety as set forth below and that the Board of Directors is hereby authorized to cause the filing of a certificate effecting such amendment with the Colorado Secretary of State; provided, however, that the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, elect to abandon such amendment at any time prior to the filing of such certificate if the Board deems such abandonment to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders: "FOURTH: The aggregate numberowners of shares ~~which~~held in their names and we will reimburse them for out-of-pocket expenses incurred on our behalf.

We will provide, without charge, upon the Corporation shall have authority to issue is two hundred million (200,000,000) shares, all of which shall be Common Stock without par value. Each share of Common Stock of the Corporation held of record at the close of business of the business date immediately preceding the effective date hereof shall be changed into one-hundredth (1/100) of one share of fully paid and nonassessable Common Stock of the Corporation. In lieu of the issuancewritten request of any ~~fractional shares that would otherwise result~~person from ~~the reverse stock split effected by the preceding sentence~~whom proxies for this meeting were solicited, a copy of this Article Fourth, the Corporation shall issue to any shareholder that would otherwise receive fractional shares one full additional share." The proposal, to be effective, must be approved by holders of a majority of the Company's outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at theour Annual ~~Meeting. Abstentions and shares not voted by brokers and other entities holding shares~~Report on behalf of beneficial owners will have the same effect as votes cast against the proposal. The Board of Directors has unanimously approved the proposal and it is believed that all officers and directors of the Company will vote their respective shares in favor of the proposal. The enclosed proxy will be voted with respect to the proposal in accordance with the instructions specified in the space provided on the proxy form. If no instructions are given, proxies will be voted FOR approval of the proposal. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposal. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table is a summary of certain information concerning the compensation awarded or paid to, or earned by, Alpha Solarco's president. No executive officer of Alpha Solarco earned more than $100,000 in salary and bonus in 1995. Summary Compensation Table Annual Compensation Name and Principal Position Year Salary($) Bonus($) All Other Compensation($) Edward C. Schmidt 1993 $52,000 -- $4,200(1) 1994 $52,000 -- $4,200(1) 1995 $88,667 -- $5,200(1) ________________ (1) Consisted of car allowance. For the three year period, no long term compensation awards (stock options, stock grants, stock appreciation rights, cash or otherwise) were issued or granted by the Company, nor was any other form of annual compensation paid by the Company to the named executive officer. Corresponding columns in the above table have consequently been omitted. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Certain Beneficial Owners Under Rule 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a beneficial owner of a security is defined to include any person who directly or indirectly has or shares voting power over such security. Such beneficial owner under this definition need not enjoy the economic benefit of such securities. The following are the only shareholders deemed to be beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Common Stock of the Company as of May 31, 1995. Title of Class Name and Address of Amount and Nature Percentage of Beneficial Owner of Ownership Class ________________________________________________________________________ Common Stock Estate of 7,726,550 shs. 7.08%(2) without Miroslav Uroshevich owned of record par value 2505 Fleetwood Ave. and beneficially(1) Cincinnati, OH 45211 Common Stock Mrs. Ingrid Uroshevich 7,726,550 shs. 7.08%(2) without 2505 Fleetwood Avenue owned of record par value Cincinnati, OH 45211 and beneficially(1) Common Stock Wilson Dennehy 25,173,281 shs. 23.06%(2) without 5753 Southmoore Lane owned of record par value Englewood, CO 80111 and beneficially(3) Common Stock Charles Dennehy 18,953,866 shs. 17.37%(2) without 51 Alden owned of record par value Lake Forest, IL 60045 and beneficially(4) __________ (1) Includes 5,525,228 shares held of record by the Estate of Mr. Uroshevich and 1,761,322 shares held of record by his widow and the Administratrix of the Estate, Mrs. Ingrid Uroshevich, and 40,000 shares held of record by Mrs. Uroshevich as custodianForm 10-K for their children. Also includes 40,000 shares which the Estate of Mr. Uroshevich has the right to acquire through the exercise of currently exercisable stock options, which options the Estate has not exercised. In addition, during his lifetime Mr. Uroshevich granted a warrant to purchase 300,000 of the shares of common stock held by him and options to purchase a total of 822,223 shares of common stock held by him. (2) This percentage assumes the exercise of currently exercisable stock options, which options have not in fact been exercised. (3) Consists of 6,153,119 shares owned of record by Mr. Wilson Dennehy and wife and 19,020,162 shares issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable, but unexercised warrants held by both. (4) Consists of 378,571 shares owned of record by Mr. Charles Dennehy and wife and 18,575,295 shares issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable, but unexercised warrants by both. Management Information with respect to each director and executive officer of Alpha Solarco and all directors and executive officers as a group, is as follows: Title of Class Name of Amount and Nature Percentage Beneficial Owner of Ownership of Class __________________________________________________________________________ Common Stock Edward C. Schmidt, 2,038,418 shs. 1.87%(3) without par value President/Director owned of record and beneficially(1) Common Stock Ben D. Woltman, 1,697,540 shs. 1.56%(3) without par value Director owned of record and beneficially(2) Common Stock Wilson Dennehy, 25,173,281 shs. 23.06%(3) without par value Director owned of record and beneficially(4) Common Stock Charles Dennehy, 18,953,866 shs. 17.37%(3) without par value Director owned of record and beneficially(5) Common Stock Frederick E. Searing, -- -- without par value Controller Common Stock All directors and 47,863,105 shs.(6) 43.85%(3) without par value executive officers as a group (5 persons) __________________ (1) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 150,000 shares of Alpha Solarco Common Stock, which options have not in fact been exercised, 30,000 shares which he owns outright, and 1,858,418 shares pledged to Alpha Solarco by State Machine for which shares he holds a proxy to vote. (2) Includes currently exercisable options and warrants to purchase 475,790 shares of Alpha Solarco Common Stock, which options have not in fact been exercised, and 40,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible debentures which have not in fact been converted. (3) These percentage amounts assume the exercise of currently exercisable stock options, which options have not in fact been exercised. (4) Consists of 6,153,119 shares owned of record by Mr. Wilson Dennehy and his wife and 19,020,162 shares issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable, but unexercised warrants held by both. (5) Consists of 378,571 shares owned of record by Mr. Charles Dennehy and 18,575,295 shares issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable, but unexercised warrants. (6) Includes currently exercisable options, warrants and/or convertible debentures to purchase 38,221,247 shares of Alpha Solarco Common Stock, which options, warrants and/or debentures have not in fact been exercised and/or converted and 1,858,418 shares pledged to Alpha Solarco which may be voted by Edward C. Schmidt as proxy for State Machine. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Between December, 1986 and May, 1993 Mr. Gerald H. Phipps, a director of Alpha Solarco, now deceased, loaned Alpha Solarco sums of money pursuant to several promissory notes with varying rates of interest. In November, 1994, the Company converted the entire Phipps' indebtedness in the amount of $845,268, including principal and interest, into equity of the Company by issuing 2,852,534 shares of common stock each, totalling 8,557,602, to Sandra Dennehy, Karen Sass, and Marta Talman, the daughters of Mr. Phipps. In May, 1995, the Company borrowed from Karen Sass and Marta Talman, children of Mr. Gerald H. Phipps, the principal sums of $1,000.00 each, payable pursuant to the terms of two promissory notes which are repayable with interest at 9% per annum, payable on demand but such demand can not be made sooner than August 31, 1996. In May, 1995, Charles Dennehy's wife, Daphne Dennehy, loaned $60,000.00 to the Company, which by the terms of the promissory note was repayable with interest at 9% per annum, payable on demand but such demand can not be made sooner than August 31, 1996. In May, 1995, Wilson Dennehy's wife, Sandra Dennehy, loaned $60,000.00 to the Company, which by the terms of the promissory note was repayable with interest at 9% per annum, payable on demand but such demand cannot be made sooner than August 31, 1996. Further, in order to induce Karen Sass, Marta Talman and Sandra Dennehy to enter into these loans, the Company entered into several stock put and call agreements, which provided that the Company repurchase shares of common stock of the Company owned by these individuals upon demand of these individuals over a period of two years for a purchase price ranging from $.1155 to $.1270 per share. During the years ended May 31, 1995 and 1994 a total of $12,650 and $3,842 interest accrued on all notes payable to directors of Alpha Solarco, respectively. The transactions described above were entered into primarily because of the relationships of the parties to such transactions. In the absence of such relationships Alpha Solarco believes that certain or all of such transactions may not have been effected, or may not have been effected on the same terms. The terms of such transactions may not be comparable to the terms which would have prevailed had such transactions occurred between unrelated third parties. AUDITORS The accounting form of Spaeth and Batterberry is presently serving as the Company's and Solectric's independent auditors. Spaeth and Batterberry also served as the Company's and Solectric's independent auditors during the fiscal year ended ~~May~~December 31, ~~1995 and has acted as auditors for~~2017, including the ~~Company and Solectric since 1988. Representatives of Spaeth and Batterberry are expected to be present at~~financial statements.Anyone requesting such documents shall submit the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. 1996 ANNUAL MEETING In order for any shareholder proposals for the 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be eligible for inclusion at the meeting, they must be received by the Company at 510 University Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85004 prior to June 19, 1996. OTHER MATTERS The Board of Directors of the Company knows of no other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting. However, if any matters other than those set forthrequest in the notice should be properly presented for action, including any adjournment of the Annual Meeting, such matters will be handled in accordance with applicable legal requirements. PROXY ALPHA SOLARCO INC. 1600 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80202 (Registered Office) THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF writing to: Innovative Food Holdings, Inc., 28411 Race Track Road, Bonita Springs, FL 34135, Attention: Secretary.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ~~The undersigned hereby appoints EDWARD C. SCHMIDT and FREDERICK E. SEARING,~~HOPES THAT STOCKHOLDERS WILL

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:	For All	Withhold All	For All Except	To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

	☐	☐	☐
1. Election of Directors
Nominees 01 Hank Cohn 02 Joel Gold 03 Sam Klepfish 04 Justin Wiernasz


The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.					For	Against	Abstain

2. To ratify the appointment of Liggett & Webb P.A. as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.					☐	☐	☐
3. To approve and authorize our Board of Directors to implement a reverse split of our outstanding Common Stock, at its discretion, in a ratio ranging from 1:2 to 1:10.					☐	☐	☐

The Board of Directors makes no recommendation with respect to the following proposals:					For	Against	Abstain

4. To conduct an advisory vote on whether, commencing in 2019, the annual meeting of shareholders should be held on or before the end of the third quarter in each year.					☐	☐	☐

5. To conduct an advisory vote on whether action by the Board of Directors should require the approval of a majority of Directors then in office, regardless of how many Directors are present at a meeting.					☐	☐	☐

6. To conduct an advisory vote on whether the Board of Directors use reasonable efforts so that a majority of the Directors will be independent Directors and if there is not a majority of independent Directors at any given time, a special committee of Directors will be formed within ten business days to initiate a formal selection process to locate persons who could fill the independent Director position.					☐	☐	☐

7. To conduct an advisory vote on whether the Board of Directors should consist of at least five Directors and if there is a vacancy, the Board of Directors should use reasonable good faith efforts to form a special Board of Directors committee within ten business days of such vacancy to initiate a formal search process to fill Board vacancies with qualified Directors.					☐	☐	☐

8. To conduct an advisory vote on whether the following transactions shall require the approval of a designated Board committee comprised of independent Directors: (i) an acquisition in which 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or 5% with respect to a related party transaction, are proposed to be issued, (ii) issuances of Company common stock which will result in a change of control of the Company, and (iii) a private placement involving common stock equal to or greater than 20% of the pre-issuance outstanding common stock at a price less than the greater of book value or market value.					☐	☐	☐

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 9 and every year on proposal 10.

9. To conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation.					☐	☐	☐

10. To conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.					Every year ☐ Abstain☐	Every 2 years☐	Every three years☐


NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.


Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]	Date			Signature (Joint Owners)	Date

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of ~~them, with full power of substitution, as proxies to vote, as designated below,~~Proxy Materials for ~~and in the name of the undersigned all shares of stock of ALPHA SOLARCO INC. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at~~ the Annual ~~Meeting of Shareholders of said Company scheduled to be held on November 15, 1995~~Meeting:

The Combined Document is available at 9:00 a.m. at the Grace Inn, I-10 Elliott Avenue (Exit 157), Phoenix, Arizona 85044 or at any adjournment or recess thereof. Please mark X in the appropriate box. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all matters. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS ___ FOR all nominees listed below. ____ WITHHOLD AUTHORITY (except as marked to the contrary below) EDWARD C. SCHMIDT, BEN D. WOLTMAN, WILSON DENNEHY, CHARLES DENNEHY DR. RICHARD L. SHELL INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write the nominee's name on the space provided below ________________________________________________________________ 2. Approval of a proposal to amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to effect a one for one hundred reverse stock split. ____ For ____ Abstain ____ Against 3. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. This Proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR all proposals. This proxy was prepared by the issuer at the direction of the Board of Directors. ALL FORMER PROXIES ARE HEREBY REVOKED. NUMBER OF SHARES _____________ Dated:____________________, 1995 ___________________________________ (Signature of Shareholder) ___________________________________ (Signature of Shareholder) (Please sign exactly as your name appears opposite. All joint owners should sign. When signing in a fiduciary capacity or as a corporate officer, please give your full title as such).

Filed by the Registrant	☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant	☐

Check the appropriate box:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owners		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class

Sam Klepfish (Officer, Director)	(1)		1,896,628		5.6	%
Joel Gold (Director)	(2)		399,054		1.2	%
Justin Wiernasz (Director)			1,578,776		4.7	%
Hank Cohn (Director)			275,000		0.8	%
Yorkmont Capital Partners, LP	(3)		2,073,398		6.1	%
A group consisting of Denver J. Smith, CRC Founders Fund, LP, Donald E. Smith, Richard G. Hill, Samuel N. Jurrens, 73114 Investments, LLC, Youth Properties, LLC, and Paratus Capital, LLC	(4)		1,818,452		5.4	%
All officers and directors as a whole (4 persons)	(5)		4,149,458		12.3	%

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)			Stock Awards ($)			Option Awards ($)			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)			Total ($)
Sam Klepfish	2017	$	376,997	$	-		$	117,060	(j)	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	18,084	(a)	$	512,141
CEO	2016	$	362,550	$	-		$	375,297	(b)	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	2,229	(a)	$	740,075
	2015	$	317,709	$	85,000	(c)	$	644,835	(b)	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	1,047,544

Justin Wiernasz	2017	$	376,997	$	65,000	(d)	$	76,190	(e)	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	12,960	(a)	$	531,147
President	2016	$	346,920	$	50,000	(f)	$	308,192	(g)	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	8,056	(a)	$	713,168
	2015	$	312,119	$	124,800	(h)	$	667,780	(i)	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	8,016	(a)	$	1,112,715

John McDonald	2017	$	199,301	$	69,000	(j1)	$	-		$	-	(n)	$	-	$	-	$	8,415	(a)	$	276,716
Principal Accounting Officer	2016	$	181,182	$	30,000	(j1)	$	43,660	(k)	$	992	(l)					$	7,959	(a)	$	263,794
	2015	$	163,611	$	38,407	(m)	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-	$	8,016	(a)	$	210,034

	Option Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#)Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options(#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)

Sam Klepfish											300,000	(a)	$	357,000	(b)
Sam Klepfish		125,000					$	1.600	01/01/18

Justin Wiernasz
Justin Wiernasz		125,000		-		-	$	1.600	01/01/18		-			-			-		-

John McDonald		25,000		-		-	$	0.570	01/01/18
John McDonald		60,000		-		-	$	1.600	01/01/18
John McDonald		75,000		-		-	$	1.700	04/04/18
John McDonald		50,000		-		-	$	2.000	04/04/18
John McDonald		37,500		-		-	$	2.500	04/04/18
John McDonald		37,500		-		-	$	3.500	04/04/18

	2:1	5:1	10:1
Number of outstanding shares	16,887,653	6,755,061	3,377,531
Number of authorized but unissued shares	483,112,347	493,244,939	496,622,469
Number of outstanding shares – fully diluted	17,212,653	6,885,061	3,442,531
Number of authorized but unissued shares - fully diluted	482,787,347	493,114,939	496,557,469

(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)	Total fee paid:

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)	Filing Party:
(4)	Date Filed:

(2)	To ratify the selection by the Board of Directors of the firm of Liggett & Webb P.A., as the Company’s independent auditors for the current fiscal year.

(3)	To approve and authorize our Board of Directors to implement a reverse split of our outstanding Common Stock, at its discretion, in a ratio ranging from 1:2 to 1:10

(4)	To conduct an advisory vote on whether, commencing in 2019, the annual meeting of shareholders should be held on or before the end of the third quarter in each year.

(5)	To conduct an advisory vote on whether action by the Board of Directors should require the approval of a majority of Directors then in office, regardless of how many Directors are present at a meeting.

(6)	To conduct an advisory vote on whether the Board of Directors use reasonable efforts so that a majority of the Directors will be independent Directors and if there is not a majority of independent Directors at any given time, a special committee of Directors will be formed within ten business days to initiate a formal selection process to locate persons who could fill the independent Director position.

(3)	Consists of 2,073,398 shares of common stock held by Yorkmont Capital Partners, LP. The address of Yorkmont Capital Partners, LP is 2313 Lake Austin Blvd. Suite 202, Austin, TX 78703. Information gathered from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2018.

(4)	Pursuant to a Schedule 13D/A file on May 24, 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mr. Denver Smith, part of the group, reports beneficially owning 1,701,803 shares, although Mr. Denver Smith only has sole voting and dispositive power over 722,679 of such shares. Mr. Smith’s address is 52 Carlson Drive, Milford, CT 06460.

(5)	Includes 4,149,458 shares of common stock held by officers and directors. Also includes 34,650 shares of common stock held by the spouses of officers and directors. Does not include approximately an additional 2,650,000 shares for which management has proxies.

Name	Age	Position with the Company	Board Committee Membership

Sam Klepfish	43	Chief Executive Officer and Director	-
Justin Wiernasz	52	Director of Strategic Acquisitions and Director	-
Joel Gold	76	Director	Audit, Nominating/Corporate Governance, Compensation
Hank Cohen	48	Director	Compensation, Audit, Nominating/ Corporate Governance

By Order of the Board of Directors,
Ronit Wallerstein,
Secretary
October 1, 2018

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: ☒	KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
	DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY